<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Pilots More Likely To Develop Skin Cancer Due To Higher Levels Of UV Radiation At High Altitude?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skincancerinformation.net/pilots-more-likely-to-develop-skin-cancer-due-to-higher-levels-of-uv-radiation-at-high-altitude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skincancerinformation.net/pilots-more-likely-to-develop-skin-cancer-due-to-higher-levels-of-uv-radiation-at-high-altitude/</link>
	<description>Skin Cancer Information and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:15:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John N</title>
		<link>http://skincancerinformation.net/pilots-more-likely-to-develop-skin-cancer-due-to-higher-levels-of-uv-radiation-at-high-altitude/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>John N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skincancerinformation.net/pilots-more-likely-to-develop-skin-cancer-due-to-higher-levels-of-uv-radiation-at-high-altitude/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>The concorde was the only plane i ever heard that being associated with and it included the passengers even thought the windows were not large, It was the altitude that had something to do with it, but the cockpit windows are like bullet proof almost and i belived they absorbed some of the uv, but tha pax never got much protection</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concorde was the only plane i ever heard that being associated with and it included the passengers even thought the windows were not large, It was the altitude that had something to do with it, but the cockpit windows are like bullet proof almost and i belived they absorbed some of the uv, but tha pax never got much protection</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony S</title>
		<link>http://skincancerinformation.net/pilots-more-likely-to-develop-skin-cancer-due-to-higher-levels-of-uv-radiation-at-high-altitude/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skincancerinformation.net/pilots-more-likely-to-develop-skin-cancer-due-to-higher-levels-of-uv-radiation-at-high-altitude/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I would imagine the canopy would provide compariable protection along with most high altitude flight suits are full cover suits, so I would say no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would imagine the canopy would provide compariable protection along with most high altitude flight suits are full cover suits, so I would say no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
